1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
Kenny argued:
"In 40 minutes steel can reach 900C when exposed to 1000C fires. So the towers stood pretty long with hindsight.
Let's assume for a moment that the WTC steel could have been
heated to 1000C in 40 minutes, which I doubt (x piece of steel in y condition
is not the same thing as the WTC building). Steven Jones makes it clear that
even NIST doesn't believe that the fires were at that temperature for more then
15 to 20 minutes:
**********************************
Both WTC 1 and WTC 2 were stable after the aircraft impact, standing for 102
min and 56 min, respectively. The global analyses with structural impact damage
showed that both towers had considerable reserve capacity. This was confirmed
by analysis of the post-impact vibration of WTC 2… where the damaged tower
oscillated at a period nearly equal to the first mode period calculated for
the undamaged structure. (NIST, 2005, p. 144; emphasis added.)
At any given location, the duration of [air, not steel] temperatures near 1,000C
was about 15 min to 20 min. The rest of the time, the calculated temperatures
were near 500oC or below.” (NIST, 2005, p. 127, emphasis added.)
**********************************
http://physics911.net/stevenjones
Kenny also argued:
"Visible deformations took place with the considerable bowing of the tower. Nothing else can explain this but extreme fire temperatures."
I've heard that the supposed bowing may have simply been refraction of light, but even assuming it wasn't, I know of no evidence that the office fires could have done it.