In post 4, shaman_ argued that those who are the most familiar with the performance of steel frame buildings disagree.He pointed to peer reviewed documents, which support the official story.
In post
5, I agree that there are certainly official story supporters from government
officials, such as certain individuals in NIST, who the government paid to 'investigate'
the case. The same people that Bill Manning, Fire Engineering's editor in chief
said were engaged in a 'half-baked farce':
http://www.fireengineering.com/articles/article_display.html?id=131225
There was also a petition signed by more then 500 architects
and engineers that reads as follows:
************************************
Please Take Notice That:
On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects
and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand,
a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the
full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapses of
the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe there is sufficient
doubt about the official story and therefore the 9/11 investigation must be
re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives
that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade
Center Twin Towers and Building 7.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
************************************
The petition and the names and credentials of the architects and engineers who
signed it can be seen here: